What makes us human?
Where do we come from?
Ever since Darwin put forward the idea
that we evolved from apes,
scientists have wondered about those first creatures
that left the ape world and crossed into ours.
In the last 50 years,
fossil finds have filled in some of the many blanks
in the story of our evolution.
But the bones of our ancestors are few and far between,
allowing only glimpses of how we slowly changed
over millions of years...
from ape...
to human.
Now, in South Africa,
in caves dangerously deep underground,
two new species of hominin, our human ancestors,
have been found.
There it was,
right there:
one of the most spectacular early hominins ever discovered
lying on the surface of a cave.
And not just a few bone fragments.
It's everywhere.
Here, there are thousands.
It's just absolutely incredible
the amount of bone that's coming up.
Oh, beautiful!
The first thing that came through my mind
was Howard Carter's anecdote
about opening Tutankhamen's tomb.
It was Lord Carnarvon in the back saying, "What do you see?"
And Carter says, "Things, wonderful things."
Yes!
We have found a most remarkable creature
and a most unexpected one.
So we need a new kind of language to talk about this.
These bones could finally bring our past into focus.
What story will they tell about how we became human?
A new light shines at the "Dawn of Humanity,"
right now on this National Geographic special.
Major funding for is provided by the following:
♪
The high plains to the northwest of Johannesburg
have been called the Cradle of Humankind.
In the 1930s and '40s, fossil finds here gave us
the first important glimpses of our earliest ancestors.
Then, for decades,
the discoveries seemed to dry up.
It looked like the Cradle of Humankind
had little left to offer.
Go get 'em, good luck.
Happy hunting.
But now, from deep caves in the Cradle
come two new discoveries
that could reshape the understanding
of our ancient past.
What is it?
It has teeth.
It's so solid!
There aren't just hundreds of bones;
there are thousands of bones.
I had never seen or dreamed
of anything like the richness of this site.
Bones that may end up illuminating
a critical million-year period in our evolution
that has long been a mystery.
There's a big gap in the fossil record
with only a few little fragments.
The fossil record suggests that
in that gap lies the dawn of humanity:
the birth of the genus Homo.
It's perhaps the least understood
and most important episode in our evolution.
Before it was the world of Australopithecus,
an ape-like creature with a tiny brain.
Lucy is the poster child for the Australopiths.
She walked upright, but belonged to the world of the apes.
If I were to see an Australopithecus
at the end of a football field,
I would probably call the zoo and say,
"Hey, an ape has escaped."
The upper part of the body
in Australopithecus is, in general way, ape-ish.
Go down, look at the pelvis, very human-like.
An Australopithecus is sort of like a bipedal ape.
If you went back in time
and saw them walking around the savannah,
you would see animals that stood up and walked like we do,
but they would've been smaller in body size.
Their brains wouldn't have been as big,
so their heads would've looked smaller.
Their jaws and teeth were very large.
The fossil record suggests that
somewhere between two and three million years ago,
these ape-like Australopiths
evolved into the first recognizably human species:
Homo erectus.
They have big brains and small faces,
adaptations for using tools.
If I were to see, say, Homo erectus
at the other end of a football field,
I would probably call 911 and say,
"Oh, there's a wild man over here,
and you know somebody should put some clothes on him."
So what went on in the transition
from Australopithecus to Homo erectus?
For years, the only species that filled that gap
was a creature called Homo habilis.
But so little of it has ever been found,
the origins of the genus Homo have remained an enigma.
The greatest mystery facing paleoanthropology today
is to try to understand how, when, where the transition
from Australopithecus to Homo occurred.
And what we don't know is what happened
between Australopithecus and early Homo.
That's one of the big mysteries right now we're trying to solve.
The prize would be to discover fossil remains
that could tell us about that mysterious transition.
And now, they may have found some.
There you can see two foot bones in articulation.
Emerging from ancient caves in South Africa
are fossil finds of astonishing richness,
and not just fragments,
but virtually complete skeletons.
From the very first block that we had,
we had a portion of the mandible, the lower jaw,
and we had a collarbone
and one of the bones of the forearm.
So that was really, really exciting.
She's in there.
We have a skull, we have a mandible,
we have a complete scapula, we have a complete clavicle,
we have a complete arm, a complete hand,
and half of the pelvis, which we can,
with reconstruction, make into a whole pelvis.
Will these skeletons live up to their promise,
offering us a new understanding of the dawn of humanity?
In August 2013, South African Pedro Boshoff was out of work.
He had been a soldier, a prospector, an adventurer,
and even a part-time student of human origins.
Now he wondered if he could earn some money
fossil hunting.
Towards the end of August,
I approached Professor Lee Berger,
asking if there would be the possibility
of a position at faculty with him.
Pedro Boshoff came into my office
and said, you know, "I really need work,
"and I have the same belief as you
that there is more out there."
Lee Berger started exploring the area of South Africa
known as the Cradle of Humankind in the early 1990s.
After 18 years of searching,
he had found only a few isolated fossils.
That's not unusual in the field of paleoanthropology.
These early human fossils
are probably the rarest sought-after objects on earth.
We in paleoanthropology sit in one of the few fields
that probably have more scientists studying objects
than there are objects to study.
In fact, the vast majority of people who do what I do
will never find a single piece of one of these early humans.
And if they do, it's going to be an isolated tooth.
Probably 80 to 90% of our record
are just little bits of isolated teeth.
Just to the northwest of Johannesburg,
the Cradle of Humankind is riddled with limestone caves.
Some have already yielded fragmentary fossils
of our remote ancestors.
Lee was convinced there were re discoveries to be made.
I had known Pedro for 20 years and I said, you know,
"Go out there, enlist your caving buddies,
get underground, and see if you can find something."
And so I bought Pedro a motorcycle
so he could move around out here.
Basically what he wanted me to do
is to go through the Cradle area,
locating and finding fossils.
So I sat as I often do on a rock
and I contemplated how I'm going to approach this,
I'm part of a caving society,
having caved in this area for years.
And in there, I found Rick and Steven.
I asked them to systematically
work their way through caves and holes
towards the east of the Cradle
while I was busy working in the west.
We often don't look
in the places that are most familiar to us
because we think we know them well.
I call it backyard syndrome.
And so I said, you know, "Start right under our noses.
Go to the most well-known places."
On September the 13th, 2013, Rick and Steve decided
to look into a cave system they thought they knew well.
It's called Rising Star.
It's an amazing cave.
It's got a bit of everything.
There's tight squeezes,
some great climbs, beautiful formations.
Rick and Steve headed deep underground.
I wanted to show Rick a great climb in the cave
called the Dragon's Back.
We climbed up there.
And in the process of taking some video
of the formations at the top of it,
Rick wanted to get past me.
So I went down a small little crevice
basically so that Rick could crawl over me.
I was just getting out of his way,
and as I went into it,
I noticed that there's still a little bit continuing down.
Once in the crevice,
Steve realized there was nothing below his feet.
He squeezed himself further down.
Every time you go down, it just goes a bit further
and a bit further and a bit further down.
You squeeze your body in so that you don't slip
and you feel around for a grip.
So my legs were dangling down this last little bit
and you don't feel anything below you.
And the only way to climb down
is actually to lower yourself as far as possible,
just keep on lowering yourself until you're literally...
your arms are almost fully stretched out,
and then you start to feel a couple of rocks
that you can actually put your feet on.
He emerged into an hidden chamber.
He called for Rick to come down and join him.
They could see massive rock formations above their heads.
But the real discovery was beneath their feet.
The floor of the cave was littered with small bones.
We saw at first one bone lying around.
We looked around a bit more and, well, another bone.
We actually spotted teeth in the rocks
and realized we actually had found something.
Followed by a skull in the ground.
And finally, one of the most interesting ones
was a mandible with four teeth in it.
Rick and Steve had no idea
what type of bones they were looking at,
but they seemed intriguing.
They took pictures and decided to show them to Pedro.
And I will never, never forget
when he came to me with his photos,
put it on the computer,
and the first thing I noticed was the jaw with the teeth.
And I realized this is definitely a hominin.
So needless to say, I called Professor Berger.
He didn't answer his phone, and we decided
we're going to drive to his house
because now we're all excited, bubbling, of course.
Arriving at his home, I rung the bell
and when he answered, my words to him was,
"Lee, you really want to talk to us!"
Pedro says, "You're really gonna want to let me in."
And, you know, 9:30 at night, and it's dark,
but I could hear that emotion in his voice.
They flipped open a computer, and I saw something
I don't think I ever dreamed I would see
on a computer screen.
A lot of swearing at first.
Apparently that's his reaction when he sees fossils.
But yeah, he immediately identified it as a hominid.
That was a mandible
of what was clearly an early hominin,
the teeth just perfect.
The next picture had a skull in it of a hominin.
I could see it in outline.
There were bones everywhere.
They'd take...
Every one of them I could see in the image
were hominin.
I was a bit in shock
because it all went like a car crash for me, you know?
It really did, black and white,
and I have only visual, not audio.
Hominins are all creatures in the human evolutionary line,
including Australopiths, Homo erectus, and us.
When his shock faded, Lee immediately turned his mind
to the question of what type of hominin this might be.
From what he could see,
Lee thought it was a single individual,
probably one of those Australopiths
that came on the scene some four million years ago.
The photos were hard to make out.
Lee wanted to know if the bones in the Rising Star cave
were similar to fossils he had discovered five years earlier.
That was in a different cave just ten miles away,
also in the Cradle of Humankind.
It was Lee's first big find.
The story all began on August the 1st, 2008,
when I came into this valley following targets,
which were these trees above my head
that I could see on Google Earth.
I walked up that old lime miners' track way,
which wasn't quite as clear as it is today,
mostly overgrown,
and I came into this grove and found this little hole.
The little valley was called Malapa.
Lee thought he knew it well.
It was a Friday.
Lee's nine-year-old son Matthew and his dog Tau were with him.
I stood at the edge of this pit and I said, "Go find fossils."
With that, Matthew raced off into the bush here.
I thought he was going to go chase giraffe or zebra
or something like that with Tau in tow,
and a minute and a half later,
he shouted, "Dad, I found a fossil."
Sitting right over by that lightning-struck tree,
he had stopped and found a little rock,
and I almost didn't go and look
because I knew he had found an antelope fossil
because that's pretty much all we ever find.
I saw a fossil.
I didn't think it was a hominin.
I just thought it was an antelope
because we find thousands of those.
I started walking towards him though
because I had to see what he had found,
and five meters away, I realized that
sticking out of that rock was a hominin clavicle.
I couldn't believe it.
I took the rock in my hand and I was turning it,
trying to think what else this could be.
And as I turned the back of it over,
there sticking out of the back was a mandible and a canine.
That's when I realized
that an extraordinary thing had taken place.
After almost 20 years
of searching in the Cradle of Humankind,
Lee finally had a major discovery.
He had his son to thank, but also a crew of Welsh miners
who had come through the valley a hundred years ago.
And they'd come through this area
looking for limestone to build Johannesburg,
and they would blast these caves apart
looking for that rich, white, pure limestone,
and they'd burn it and make cement out of it.
In the 1880s Johannesburg was a gold rush town,
little more than a collection of shacks.
But it sat on some of the richest gold seams
ever discovered.
As the gold kept coming, so did the gold prospectors.
The town grew
and construction crews were desperate for limestone,
essential for cement and gold processing.
Lime miners combed the high veld outside the town
looking for seams of limestone.
Although they likely didn't know it,
these seams concealed remnants of ancient cave systems
and were full of fossils.
When they found the limestone seam at Malapa,
they laid their charges as usual.
They came in here and put in three,
at the most four, blasts.
One right below me here, one over on the side,
one over there that I can see.
Then, for some reason,
the miners never collected the blocks of lime
and left the blast hole largely untouched.
I'm not sure why they did that,
but what they did do in that process
was expose just the edge of these remarkable skeletons.
They damaged it just enough so we could find this site
and could make these fossil discoveries,
but not too much that they destroyed the evidence.
It really is a miracle.
It was in one of the rocks scattered by the blast
that Matthew found the collarbone of a child.
But that was just the beginning.
The hole where the miners planted the dynamite
would soon yield so much more.
It was only once I had the permit
and we came back on September 4, a whole bunch of us.
That we spent all morning looking here
and we found nothing.
We were even thinking of leaving
because we thought there wasn't anything here.
I stood over on the other side of this pit,
looking down into that pit,
and I saw something sticking out of the rock right down here.
And what I saw stunned me.
And I climbed down the pit and looked right over here,
and there sticking out of the wall
was the proximal humerus of a hominin.
I couldn't believe it... I did my PhD on this.
I climbed closer, and as I got closer,
I realized there was a scapula of the shoulder blade in place,
and I came even closer
and put my hand on the wall, right here,
and two hominid teeth fell into my hand.
Then I said something,
and that started the second part of this remarkable story.
Everyone piled down in here,
at my feet was a proximal femur in a block here
that clearly belonged to the child.
What was amazing was it never crossed my mind
that this wasn't the child that Matthew had found.
How could you find two skeletons in a site like this?
What it would turn out to be, of course,
was a second skeleton, the female skeleton.
The child would be laying right here,
just lying in position here,
and it would turn out that there were other skeletons here.
There's one sitting over there.
There's a baby just above me here,
and who knows how many are in front of me here.
It really is a treasure trove of paleoanthropology.
One by one, they took out blocks of stone
they thought might have hominin fossils in them,
remnants of our ancient human family.
The blocks were all taken back
to the University of the Witwatersrand.
At the medical school,
Lee's wife, Jackie, a radiologist,
ran the blocks through a CT scanner,
allowing the scientists to peer inside.
There you go, okay, that's good.
What one of those blocks revealed was stunning.
A slice came through,
and you could see an entire skull.
I was dumbfounded.
I could not in my wildest dreams believe an entire skull
could be sitting in this little rock.
Then began the painstaking job
of freeing the skull from the rock
that had encased it for possibly millions of years.
It took me three months to get it out.
I was the first one that saw this.
And you can't describe it to anybody.
It's beautiful.
I mean, it's been in the ground
for 1.9 million years,
and you're the first person to see that.
I thought, "Well, you're beautiful."
I basically brought this boy back to life.
Finally, the skull was free.
Its small brain and forward-projecting face
made it clear that it was an Australopith.
But details of the teeth and other parts of the skeleton
made it unlike any found before.
Many types of Australopithecus once walked the earth
between about two and four million years ago.
Lucy is known as afarensis.
There's also Australopithecus africanus.
This appeared to be an entirely new species.
Lee called it Australopithecus sediba
after the waterhole near which it was found.
In the local language Sotho, "sediba" means "wellspring."
The team was able to radioactively date
the limestone layers in the cave with great precision.
The layer containing the sediba skeletons
was 1.97 million years old.
That makes these creatures among the last of their kind,
living right at the end of the fossil gap
between Australopiths and Homo erectus.
Here at last was a creature
that could tell us something about that transition.
And the bones were not just fragments.
Here were two remarkably complete skeletons,
a female and a child.
Still encased in the rock at Malapa
are fragments of at least three more,
waiting to be excavated.
This made sediba the most complete evidence ever found
for what was going on at the dawn of humanity.
The Australopithecus sediba fossils
are some of the most spectacular skeletons known
for early hominids.
They're absolutely amazing.
We don't get two bones
associated with one another very often,
much less several bones, much less partial skeletons.
So that makes these fossils really special.
Sediba was exciting from the get-go.
Right away, we knew that we had parts of the skeleton
and we had parts of the cranium,
which helps us figure out who this animal is.
So that was really, really exciting,
and initially, these upper limb bones looked very primitive,
so we knew we were dealing with something
that looked like it would be a good climber,
kind of an ape-like creature.
Peter Schmid's job is to reconstruct sediba's skeleton.
Unlike past fossil finds,
here, the skeletons are so complete,
there doesn't have to be much guesswork.
By scanning and mirror imaging,
Peter can fill in any missing bones with great accuracy.
From the CT, we've got a few thousand slices now,
and Aurore has to put everything together to form a 3D model.
And then we have to cut the model
because the pelvis we already casted,
so we only need the rib cage.
But the right rib cage we have already,
but we need now the mirror image of that,
and the computer helps us to do the mirror image in a second.
Layer by layer,
a 3D printer then slowly prints the rib cage in fine plaster.
Beautiful.
Finally, Peter has assembled a complete skeleton.
It's highly unusual.
All Australopiths are a mix of ape and human,
but sediba has a unique mosaic of features
scientists have never seen before in the same creature.
The arm is very long, like in a chimpanzee,
but the hand is with short fingers
and a very long thumb, like a human hand
which was never found until now
because this is the most complete hand ever found
in this period.
Job Kibii, who was with Lee and Matthew
when they discovered the skeletons,
has been working on the sediba hand.
He's found an unusual combination
of ape and human features here too.
What's special about sediba's arm and hand
is that we know sediba has a very long thumb,
which is more chimp-like,
but sediba has a very human-like hand.
For example, sediba has a thumb
which is longer relative to the other fingers,
which indicates a human-like condition.
Sediba's hand, with its opposable thumb
and forefingers,
is so human that it could've been a tool user.
But since no tools were found,
that remains only an intriguing possibility.
From the reconstructed skeleton, paleoartist Viktor Deak
can start to create a lifelike digital painting.
By virtually applying tissue thickness markers
carefully calculated
from the known facial tissues of living primates,
he can build up a realistic impression of sediba's face.
Once that was all done,
I have now gone ahead and created a body for it,
and if you want to see,
we can check all that by going transparent
and seeing, making sure that the bones and everything line up
in the proper spaces.
So here we have a concept reconstruction
of how sediba potentially could look like.
The step from there to a lifelike digital painting
is a short one.
Finally, for the first time in almost two million years,
the face of Australopithecus sediba
looks out on the world once again.
But the true revelations will come from the bones themselves.
Because they are so well preserved,
these fossils will give scientists
unprecedented insights
into the lives of these ancient creatures...
Everything from what they ate to how they died.
Such details might help explain the Australopiths' transition
Homo.
They might also prove or disprove
a highly influential theory about the dawn of humanity...
A theory inspired by the very first discovery
of an Australopith fossil.
The year is 1924.
Anatomist Raymond Dart
teaches at the University of the Witswatersrand in Johannesburg.
His hobby is fossil hunting,
but he never imagines he will find a human ancestor.
Nobody at the time believes we had evolved in Africa.
Well, in the late 19th century,
fossils were found in Europe with the Neanderthals.
They were found in Asia
with the earliest known examples of Homo erectus.
No one really had a sense
that anything interesting occurred in Africa.
Darwin and Huxley predicted that our origins
would be in Africa based on comparative anatomy.
You know, they looked at the skeletons
of chimps and gorillas,
and they looked at ours and they went,
"Well, they're so close to us
"and they're more close than anything else,
so it must have been in Africa."
And then the sort of second generation
of evolutionary biologists shied away from that.
They started to find fossils in Europe.
They started to find fossils in Asia.
And, of course, that tied in very nicely
with sort of racist, imperialistic thoughts
of the day.
They couldn't abide the thought of it being in Africa.
In late 1924, Raymond Dart receives a package.
He sees it's from the mining town of Taung
in South Africa's Northwest Province.
And in that box is a fossil,
and this is a game-changing fossil.
It's been sent to him by miners
who noticed what looks like the skull of a small ape
encased in the rock.
Dart is fascinated.
He begins the long, laborious process
of revealing the mysterious skull.
He can see that it is the skull of a child,
but like no child he has ever seen before.
It has ape-like characteristics, but also some very human ones.
And so as he cleaned this fossil
and he saw the hole in the bottom of the skull
where the spinal cord enters the brain underneath
that he had something like a two-legged walker on his hands.
And this he named Australopithecus africanus,
and what that means is "southern human of Africa."
Dart rushed into print with his find.
He claimed it is proof that we evolved in Africa,
just as Darwin had predicted.
He was unprepared for the firestorm his theory unleashed.
The Taung child sparked an incredible revolution.
Up to that point, everybody said,
"Let's look to Europe for our ancestors."
It was unthinkable that anything as important
as the emergence of humans could have happened in Africa.
Raymond Dart was a feisty guy,
and when he was pushed back by the British intelligentsia,
he became feistier, more aggressive
in terms of his defending of his views.
Most scientists disagreed with him.
He really was seen as an outsider,
but it absolutely set the ball rolling
for, one, paleoanthropology as a field in Africa,
and, two, vindication of what Darwin and Huxley
had predicted with actual fossil evidence.
It showed once and for all that our origins were in Africa
and only in Africa, and that's huge.
It totally changed the field.
Dart was sure he had discovered the missing link
between apes and humans.
But it wasn't enough to know what they looked like.
He wanted to know how they behaved.
What sort of creatures were they?
He understood that these great questions about our ancestors
were also questions about ourselves.
The reason we are interested in our own ancestry, I think,
is the reason that you or I want to know
who our parents were and who our grandparents were
or great-grandparents were, because somewhere in us,
we realize that there's a little bit of them in us,
so to understand the quirks of our own behavior
and why we do things,
if not just why we look the way we do,
comes from that ancestry.
Paleoanthropology is just that in deep time.
We're looking way back.
And so we're looking at the things,
the sort of little bits and pieces
that drive why humanity is like it is today.
Raymond Dart was building a theory
about how the Australopiths, our ape-like ancestors,
became human.
His ideas about the dawn of humanity were the touchstone
for thinking about our origins for generations.
In the 1940s,
more examples of Australopithecus
began to be found.
And a key site not only had fragments of Australopithecus,
but also the bones of many other fossil animals.
And Dart noted that these bones were broken in a special way.
Dart became convinced they were weapons
made by our primitive ancestors.
Was this the key to what first made us human?
Dart had been a young medic in World War I.
He had seen firsthand
the barbarity humans are capable of.
It made sense to him that the origins of humanity
were steeped in blood.
Raymond Dart's experience in the World War
may have colored his interpretation
of what these bones and teeth meant.
You know, it gave him a view
of the dark side of humanity and the violence of humanity,
and he came up with this idea that Australopithecus
had figured out that bones and teeth were hard
and could be used as weapons to kill other animals,
the sort of killer ape theory of early humans.
Dart believed that the more aggressive
and adventurous of our ape-like ancestors
abandoned their forest environments
and moved into savannahs.
There, they became hunters and predators.
His theory that this violent transformation
gave rise to humanity soon found an audience
far beyond the small world of paleoanthropology.
In the 1950s, there was a drama critic
and playwright named Robert Ardrey
who became very interested in human origins,
and he went to Africa and spoke with Raymond Dart.
And Robert Ardrey, being a dramatist,
could write like anything, and he wrote this amazing book
published in 1961 called African Genesis.
African Genesis became a pop science
publishing sensation of the early 1960s.
Ardrey's ideas, building on those of Raymond Dart,
helped frame public debate about the dawn of humanity
for the next 20 years.
The very first sentence in that book,
I remember it because I read it as a teenager
and was enthralled by it:
"Not in innocence and not in Asia was mankind born."
And in that one sentence,
he encapsulated Raymond Dart's ideas
that it was an African genesis, and that where we came from
was not from an innocent creature
but from the most violent of killer apes.
One of Robert Ardrey's greatest fans
was the filmmaker Stanley Kubrick.
At the time, he was planning a film
based on the science fiction novel A Space Odyssey.
It was to be a meditation on human technology run wild.
On a mission to Jupiter,
the spacecraft's computer turns on the crew.
At the beginning of the film,
our ancestors discover the first technology:
weapons.
Eventually, they will use them on each other.
This was the "dawn of humanity" imagined by Dart and Ardrey.
And so this sets up then for Kubrick
the same conflict that Dart felt.
For Dart, that first weapon
explained the emergence of human beings,
while at the same time,
it explained the atrocities of the 20th century.
Are we killer apes at heart?
Is this what we will discover about our ancestors
at the dawn of humanity?
The discoveries at Malapa may finally provide evidence
to support or refute Raymond Dart's theory.
The sediba skeletons are so well preserved,
they give the scientists a unique glimpse into their lives.
And that's the story
how did these individuals really live
out there in the environment?
What did they do on a daily basis?
Whether they were so-called "killer apes" or not
can be seen in what they ate.
The first direct evidence comes from their teeth.
At the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig,
Amanda Henry is analyzing calculus, or tartar,
fossilized along with sediba's teeth.
Calculus is what happens when the bacteria in your mouth
form a film on your teeth.
So it's this very thick, layered,
heavily mineralized material that forms around your gum line
and on all sorts of surfaces of your teeth.
And as it forms, it traps bacteria and proteins
and remnants of your food inside.
Just like the tartar dentists remove from our teeth,
the calculus from sediba's teeth
provides a snapshot of what they were eating.
So once I have the calculus here in this little powdered form,
I'm going to dissolve it in a little bit of a weak acid,
and then we're gonna rinse that acid off,
and hopefully what we'll be left with
is micro-remains with this mineral matrix removed,
and then we'll look at that under a microscope
and see if we can identify what was in the calculus.
Amanda can see what sediba was eating
when she discovers phytoliths,
the microscopic remains of plants.
Well, this is a phytolith that we recovered
from the calculus of the sediba individuals,
and we have a couple of examples here
all from different plants that this individual ate.
Here at last is evidence
that will help support or disprove Dart's theory.
Well, this is the first time that we've had direct evidence
of the kinds of foods that any Australopith ate.
We've had proxy information before,
we've had sort of vague categories
where the food's harder or tougher,
but this is direct evidence.
That's exciting.
What Amanda can see trapped in sediba's tartar
are microscopic remains of many different plants.
We have phytoliths from grasses,
we have phytoliths from the bark or woody tissue of plants,
and we have phytoliths possibly from fruits,
so all the evidence suggests that
the foods that this individual was eating
was coming from closed forested regions,
so eating fruits, maybe chewing on stems,
eating the grasses that are growing in that area.
The tooth evidence from sediba
indicates a diet very similar to today's chimpanzees.
While they may have eaten some meat,
there's little to back up Raymond Dart's theory
that they were killer apes.
So later scientists came and looked at the evidence
and found that there were tooth marks
in the skull of an Australopithecus individual,
and that was just really compelling evidence
that Australopithecus maybe, instead of being the predator,
was the prey.
So our ancestors, or the early hominin in South Africa,
were the victims, rather than being the carnivores
that Raymond Dart wanted them to be.
The caves in which he was finding
not only the remains of human ancestors,
but the remains of many, many, many other animals,
which he thought were being consumed
and devoured by our ancestors,
were actually all the victims of predators and carnivores
who were pulling all of those animals into the cave.
It seems Raymond Dart's vision of our ancestors
as the first killer apes,
so famously portrayed by Stanley Kubrick, was wrong.
The sediba skeletons are so well preserved,
they offer the team a chance to investigate
not just the lives,
but the deaths of these individuals.
They can analyze the two-million-year-old death scene
almost as if it were a forensic case.
I mean, we're looking at the preservation
of organic material here.
These animals are articulated the way they died.
The breakage patterns may often be a result
of the moments before or shortly after their death.
So far, the team has excavated the skeletons
of a female adult and a child.
So the female was this one.
And the juvenile is all the bones in blue,
all of these.
They were found very close to each other.
Aurore Val has been creating a virtual reconstruction
of the scene at the bottom of the cave.
Besides the sediba skeletons,
there are the skeletons of many other animals too.
How did they all get there?
Two million years ago, Malapa was a much deeper cave.
Landscape erosion has reduced it
to a small depression in the ground.
But when Australopithecus sediba was around,
it was a cave system about 90 feet deep.
Imagine a vertical shaft going up.
There's probably water dripping down, roots hanging down.
Right here is the curled-up body of the female,
lying right there is a child's body,
the 13-year-old boy.
There are other animals, all being eaten by bugs
and going through the usual process of decay.
This reconstruction shows the sediba death scene
in great detail.
Now the team want to know how all these creatures died.
Were they dragged in by predators, or did they fall?
The man to answer that question is Patrick Randolph-Quinney.
He's an eminent forensic anthropologist
more accustomed to working on murder cases and mass graves.
I'm involved in looking at homicides
and involved in looking
at the forensic identification process,
So, unknown remains,
giving them back their identity and their name,
that's what I do for a living.
The skull of the child is the first piece of evidence.
This is this fracture here,
and it's a fracture that's actually separated
part of the body of the jaw,
and it runs up through the tooth.
And basically, if you're in an impact,
you jar your teeth together
and you create compression on the tooth row,
and that provides force, or generates force,
which goes down to the tooth roots.
And what this has done
is actually split part of the corpus apart.
So it's actually damage
consistent with effectively an impact on the jaw,
and the energy has come from the teeth
out into the bone around it.
And that only happens mechanically with fresh bone,
so this individual was still functioning skeletally
when this happened.
The mandible fracture is a green fracture
that happened when the bone was fresh, at or around death.
It would be consistent with a fatal fall.
The fractures to the forearms are even more telling.
And if you look at MH2,
she's got a fracture that runs through the body of this joint,
where it articulates in the elbow with the humerus,
the bone of the upper arm.
There are also other fractures associated with the wrist,
in this portion of the ulna and this portion of the radius.
And we've actually got fractures
in the scaphoid and triquetral bone in the wrist as well.
And what this appears to indicate
is putting your hand out to stop yourself.
This seems to be good evidence
the individual was alive when she fell.
The cave at Malapa was probably a death trap.
Were they searching for water and lost their grip?
Perhaps they were trying to escape in terror
from some predator.
Whatever the reason, they fell and died
either immediately on impact or soon after.
It appears that mud then buried the bodies,
and as it hardened, kept them from disintegrating.
This is why they were so well preserved.
Then began the long, slow process of fossilization
in which all organic material in the bone
was replaced by minerals.
Today, the sediba fossils are still yielding insights
into the Australopith world of almost two million years ago.
But the most tantalizing question of all
is still unanswered.
How did these primitive creatures evolve
into more advanced human ancestors?
To find out, scientists need to find
perhaps the most elusive fossils of all:
the first members of our genus Homo.
For decades, the only fossils that came close
were the fragmentary remains of a creature called Homo habilis:
handyman.
In the early 1960s, fossils discovered
from Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania by the Leakeys
led to the definition of a new fossil species
Homo habilis... Handyman.
And what was significant about that
is that stone tools were connected
with what Leakey proposed as the first human,
a member of our lineage, the genus Homo.
Like most scientists at the time,
Louis Leakey thought our evolution
was probably a gradual, linear process:
a single chain of species
becoming progressively more human.
He decided the key event
that made our ancestors cross the threshold to humanity
was not the invention of weapons,
as Raymond Dart believed, but tools.
Since Homo habilis seemed to be the first toolmaker,
he declared it the first member Homo.
Here at last was the link
between the ape-world of the Australopiths
and the human world of Homo erectus.
So there was always this gap between Australopithecus
and later members of the genus Homo,
like Homo erectus and Neanderthals,
and we didn't really know
what species in that gap would have looked like,
and then along in the 1960s, along comes along Homo habilis,
and it's slightly bigger brained,
it's probably a bit more bipedal,
and of course it had these stone tools associated with it,
and it was argued very strongly to be a contender
for early Homo, and it was instantly controversial
and it's still controversial to some people today.
It's a bit of a mess.
Because it became clear probably in the 1990s
and moving into the early 21st century
that Homo habilis, we really didn't know what that was.
One of the main reasons for classifying it as human
was that it was found with tools.
But that is now looking less like a defining characteristic
of the genus Homo.
We now know that even the more primitive Australopiths
had the capacity to use stone tools.
Zeresenay Alemseged, who discovered
a three-million-year-old Australopith
called Dikika child, has found what he believes to be evidence
of stone tool use in the same period.
If you were defining Homo habilis as a toolmaker,
tool user, then what do you make of it
when you see that Australopithecus
was doing the same thing?
We know that there is rudimentary stone tool use...
Not stone tool but stone use... Among living chimpanzees.
The confusion surrounding Homo habilis has grown.
It has been compounded
by the fact that so little of it has ever been found.
Colleagues have said, you know, if you had a shoebox,
you could put all those fossils that might be early members
of the genus Homo into it
and still have room for a good pair of shoes.
With so few fossils to go on,
scientists had little they could say for sure
about the first members of our genus, Homo.
This was the situation
when the two young cavers, Rick Hunter and Steven Tucker,
made their discoveries in the Rising Star cave.
When Lee saw the photos from the fossil chamber,
he could only hope they would clear up the confusion.
Was it another sediba or was it even Homo habilis?
The only way to find out was to bring up the fossils.
Lee knew there was no time to waste.
I had to make a decision,
and about, oh, just before 1:00 a.m.,
I decided that history would never forgive me
if I did not act right then.
Just five weeks later,
the Rising Star excavation was beginning to take shape.
Its planning had taken some ingenuity.
Lee knew he would never be able
to get down to the fossil chamber himself.
In places, the chamber entrance
was less than seven inches wide.
I put a call out on Facebook saying,
"I need skinny scientists
"who are not claustrophobic, who are cooperative,
"who can work together
"in a dangerous and difficult environment.
And I need you available by the first of November."
I saw Lee's Facebook post, actually,
and on a whim I applied for it, and then the next thing I know
I got asked to interview and from there,
just things started happening really quickly.
I saw a call that came out on Facebook from Lee
that was looking for skinny scientists,
skinny paleoanthropologists,
that weren't claustrophobic and that would be able to fit
into a slot that was about 18 centimeters,
and that was very intriguing.
I didn't say what had been discovered.
I didn't say anything about what I thought it was.
They only knew it was me in South Africa
and it was clearly underground.
I thought I'd get three, four, five applicants, I really did.
I mean, how many people in the world could be qualified
and fit that criteria?
Within ten days I had 57 qualified applicants
from all over the world, most of them women.
One morning I woke up and there was a call
for tiny, experienced archaeologists from Lee Berger
and I thought, "That's me."
I received the Facebook post
via a friend who saw that it was an ad for a small archaeologist
with caving and climbing experience
and she said, "That's you!"
I'm almost finishing a Ph.D. in physical anthropology,
osteology, so this is my area.
I'm an archaeologist,
so I can study up quick on the paleo stuff.
I'm a Ph.D. candidate
specializing in evolutionary biomechanics,
so more on the paleo- anthropological side of things.
It really seemed perfect, in fact.
When I read the callout to my husband, he said,
"Well, they might as well have just meant, you know,
'Marina is wanted over here.'"
So...
The Rising Star expedition
was to be a new kind of paleoanthropology
tailor-made for the age of social media and the Internet.
I held Skype interviews, and I did a few things in that,
with the 11 people I'd short-listed
out of this spectacular list of applicants.
Lee explained a little bit about how the cave was found
and shared with us some video footage
and the initial photographs that Steve and Rick took.
And he told us about the conditions of traveling
into the cave.
So, you know, he wanted to make sure that we really knew
what we were getting into.
It was mysterious.
It was very enticing for that reason.
You know, sort of wondering what sort of circumstances there were
that necessitated asking for small people
with excellent paleontological skills.
In the Skype interviews,
I wanted to see these people face-to-face,
but I also wanted to test some things.
I needed to know that if I shut the cameras off,
which I did for many of them,
I want to hear if they could respond to me.
Because I had already designed by then
this system of communication, I knew.
I knew I was never going to...
I will never set foot in that chamber.
Then maybe a day after that, I was told I was a go.
It was so fast, so fast.
And I sent off emails saying,
"Congratulations, pack your bags.
Expect to be here in the first week of November."
Then I got the email that said that I... I got it
and then characteristically I bust out crying,
and just kept reloading my email to make sure,
refreshing it, just like, really, it's really there,
it's really there, and I screamed so loud.
It was a very quick process.
The ad went up
and then the interviews happened the next week,
and then I learned a day later
that I was accepted to the project.
All of a sudden I was rearranging my schedule
and waiting for the plane tickets and packing up
and reading quickly everything that I needed to know and...
so it was fast and furious getting ready for this.
My brain was just like a flurry,
like an explosion of glitter and confetti.
Just...
It's everything, it's like every best birthday and Christmas
and Hanukah and Kwanzaa and it's everything, all at once.
I figured if he thought I could do it,
if Lee thought I could do it, then I could do it.
I had no illusions that this was going to be easy.
Nothing like this had ever been done,
certainly in the African context I knew, perhaps ever,
anywhere, and I knew I had to have everything
from medical support to safety support to the design
of the infrastructure underground and above ground
and all the things that go on with a scientific expedition.
Yeah, let's get a bag.
As the camp was set up, Pedro, Rick and Steve readied the cave
for the excavators.
Safety lines, lights, cables and cameras were installed.
The possibility for accidents was ever present.
Lee rehearsed safety procedures over and over again.
Critical issue is, no one panic.
Yeah, yes, we see you.
A command post was set up from which he could watch
virtually every part of the cave.
I really began to get a feel
for what I was putting these young women into
as the cavers who were laying over two kilometers of cable.
And I think they were terrified and I was terrified,
They were still untested.
We took them through the caves testing their capabilities
in this system.
And so we reached the 10th,
which was my intended day of going in
and we tested systems, everything worked.
It was a little sloppy but it worked.
We tested safety, it all worked,
and by the early afternoon we were ready.
You'd be surprised, I'm actually a person of gentle soul.
Is it weeping in the corner like a Gollum?
Marina, Becca, and Hannah have been chosen to go down first.
Still, nobody knows exactly what they will find.
I've seen a skull, I've seen the other pieces.
I am pretty sure that we have got quite a lot of a skeleton
of at least one hominin.
That of course waits to be seen,
and it's going to happen pretty fast now
over the next several hours.
Anxiously watched by Lee and the team in the command post,
Marina, Becca and Hannah make their way
deeper and deeper underground.
The descent is difficult.
And as I looked down there I thought, oh, you know,
I don't know if I'm... if I can do this,
but then once I was committed to go down, it was actually
much, much easier than I was dreading.
Just trying to also slow it down a bit
because I've got the GoPro running.
It was just an amazing, an amazing feeling to realize
how far away you are from everyone up top
in the command center, and to just fully realize
what you are down there to do.
I became a little bit overwhelmed,
but you also have to turn that off in some sense
because you're only down there for a limited amount of time
and you have a job to do, a very important job to do.
Going down the chute for the first time was...
honestly it wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be.
And then you come into a landing zone
and there's a hallway to pass through.
It's not really a squeeze,
but it's a narrow passage to pass through
and then the chamber opens up again.
This is the entrance to the cave here.
So you start by descending down, you know,
a fairly narrow shaft and some tunnels.
You get down into an area here.
This is what we call the Superman crawl,
which is a very narrow crawl.
You have to crawl on your stomach for about three meters.
Then you enter into another chamber.
This is what we call the Dragon's Back,
so that's the ridge climb
with the sort of four- or five- meter drop on either side.
You get up to the top of Dragon's Back and you end up
at the top of the chute,
which is another sort of tunnel access
that then you start the 12-meter descent into the chamber,
so that's this area here.
Once you drop into the chamber,
you're actually just in a landing zone.
It's another sort of antechamber.
You then go through another passageway
into the main chamber,
which we call UW-101, or the fossil chamber.
Marina is the first to enter the chamber.
There was a little bit of trepidation, I have to confess,
and a lot of excitement
to be the first of the advance scientists to go into the cave.
The first thing that came through my mind
when I went through the final slot
into the actual final chamber was Howard Carter's anecdote
about opening Tutankhamen's tomb.
I think it was Lord Carnarvon in the back saying, you know,
"What do you see?"
And Carter says, "Things, wonderful things."
And it was that feeling.
God, this place is beautiful.
First of all, the cave is beautiful,
just geologically beautiful, and then you look down
and it was just a sea of bone
and it was obviously just not regular bone.
So, yeah, it was amazing, amazing.
And then I saw them enter this chamber.
We got the cameras set up and you could see their feet moving.
And it was surreal.
Fantas...
Fantastic!
There we go.
Skull is being flagged.
You can see the skull here.
She's now flagging the mandible.
And then the process started.
The process of doing science began.
So we'll put pin ♪1 right beside the mandible
and that's where we'll concentrate.
Okay.
Okay, das ist super.
Okay, thanks.
Bye.
Yeah, that's perfect right there.
Okay, going to start scanning.
Okay, scan.
The first foray into the fossil chamber lasts only a few hours,
enough time to start scanning and flagging bone fragments
as well as to test the safety systems.
Okay, how didthat go?
Let's see.
It's mapping right now.
Finally it's time to bring up the first precious fossil,
the mandible.
Uh, there, there, coming.
I see what looks like a mandible in the middle there.
On the right.
That looks fantastic.
It's Becca who will take care of it on the ascent.
All right!
You got the fossil, huh?
Yes, I got the fossil.
Well done.
Here you go.
And we have everyone else.
Everyone's out. Rick's out safe.
They're all out. Well done.
And so first their safety, in that they were out
was just this enormous emotive relief,
and then the sense that they had actually got this thing,
so now I was going to see for the first time
what all of this was about.
When they opened that little box and we unwrapped this thing
that they collected,
every great idea we had
went out the window, gone, you know.
Suddenly we didn't know what we had.
When he had first seen the jawbone
in Rick and Steve's photos,
Lee had decided it probably belonged to an Australopith.
One of the most striking characteristics
of an Australopith's face is its large, apelike jaws and teeth.
As the Australopiths transitioned
into the genus Homo, their faces shrunk.
Jaws and teeth became smaller.
When he finally had the jawbone in his hands,
Lee saw it was too small to be an Australopith.
It seemed quite human.
Could it be a new specimen of Homo habilis?
Or could it be a new transitional species
between Australopiths and early Homo?
These are the questions on anatomist Peter Schmidt's mind
as he studies the mandible from Rising Star.
You have this molar teeth
and the very strange use of the frontal part here.
And luckily we got another piece
so with these two pieces we have a hemi mandible
which is complete and then we can put on the mirror image,
and we have sort of outline.
Peter can then compare it to the mandible of Homo habilis.
I will take this away
and you see this is the tooth row of Homo habilis.
You see also that these are massive teeth, but the tooth row
is straight and we have a very strong shelf here.
The mandible from Rising Star is clearly more curved.
It's not Homo habilis, and it's not an Australopith.
They don't know what it is.
This is pure confusion.
We don't know what to make of it.
We realize all of our preconceived notions
have to be tossed aside.
We can't go into this thinking it's going to belong
in this group or belong in that group.
We just have to start from literally scratch.
The team hopes that as more fossils emerge from the cave,
the confusion will clear up.
It's so solid.
There is reason to be optimistic.
Each descent reveals more bones.
Where once they thought there might be one individual,
they now see evidence of a whole lot more.
It was probably a couple of hours into the first day
when we realized it also wasn't one skeleton.
Another femur.
If I remember, right,
it started with a second femur from the same side
and since there has never been a three-legged hominin,
we knew there were two, and then there were three.
And I think it was by day two, there were four.
And we realized we were
in something very, very, very special.
All right, good luck with that, Becca, we can't wait to see you.
You've got something we want to see.
Every time the scientists in the cave remove a piece of bone,
they find more bones beneath it.
It's everywhere.
I mean, it's all strewn, all throughout.
Not just the chamber, but the passages leading to it
are littered with bone fragments.
At the landing zone where they stopped,
I'd get a call on the intercom.
"We found another tooth."
It was just sitting there.
I was trying to find a nice place to sit, and there it is.
It just caught my eye.
Rick was sitting there as a safety caver waiting,
and he kicked the dirt and hominins fell out.
You have to pass me up some flags.
Do you have enough flags?
By the afternoon of day 14 in the expedition,
we were overwhelmed.
I'd started with one safe to hold one skeleton,
day three we had two safes, day four we had three safes,
day six, people were going, "We need more safes."
Woo-hoo!
Tooth und more.
I don't know whether you should hug me
for someone finding something in the other spot.
Oh, man.
By day 14, as we would get fossil after fossil,
we were getting 40, 50, 60, 70 elements a day,
all that was flashing through my mind as I was doing that
was that famous scene in Jaws where Roy Scheider is chumming
and they hadn't yet seen the shark.
And he's sitting there chumming
and all of a sudden this gigantic shark appears.
And he goes, "We're going to need a bigger boat."
We're gonna need a bigger safe.
It's extraordinary.
I think this year at Christmas I'm just going to hang
one of these instead of a stocking.
As the fossils accumulate in ever-greater numbers,
a picture of the creature of the Rising Star cave
begins to emerge.
This is part of a juvenile pelvis.
Thigh and hip bones tell them it was an upright walking biped,
but its gait was primitive.
From what they can see of the exposed skull, it is small,
not much bigger than a chimp's.
I'm gonna have to tell them to leave that alone.
But the teeth and jaws seem Homo-like.
The team's excitement grows.
It's beginning to look as if they have found another species
from the dawn of humanity.
But on which side of the Australopith-Homo divide
will it fall?
One of the key fossils that will tell them that is the skull.
They are saving that until last.
Distance is perfect.
And I can see marker two.
Record.
Recording.
In the meantime,
another extraordinary fact is becoming evident.
There are no other animals in the cave.
All the fossils are human ancestors.
This is unheard of.
It was pretty surprising
that something completely normal to every other excavation
I have ever been in on the continent of Africa,
everyone I have ever heard of on the continent of Africa,
wasn't happening here.
We weren't getting anything else other than hominins.
When early hominins are discovered in caves,
they are always found along with the bones of other animals
that have either wandered in and died
or been dragged there by predators.
They're mixed with antelopes generally in huge abundance.
Then you get, depending on the circumstance,
some carnivores and other bits and pieces, and rodents,
and the stuff that accumulates when things die
and are eaten and are dragged into caves.
Apart from the bones of a solitary owl,
there's not a single other animal
in the Rising Star chamber, only hominins.
So how did these creatures get in there?
The chamber is very inaccessible,
deep in the dark zone of the cave, with no entrance
other than the long, narrow chute.
The team believes it likely was just as inaccessible
two million years ago.
It is starting to look
as if the bodies might have been intentionally placed there.
Could this possibly be some sort of burial?
There has never been evidence of anything like this
linked to such a primitive-looking ancestor.
So we got that looming in front of us
and don't have an answer to it.
Until now, the earliest known burials
are from about 100,000 years ago
and a much more advanced form of early human.
The team doesn't have a date yet
for the fossils of Rising Star, but it seems unthinkable
that such a primitive-looking creature
could be disposing of its dead.
But that's what it looks like.
And the age ranges of the individuals are very similar
to what archaeologists find in cemeteries.
At the early stages of this expedition,
they look like a cemetery population:
very young individuals and very old individuals
and nothing in the middle so far.
It doesn't mean we're not going to find it,
but that's what you see in a cemetery when you dig it up.
Right now it looks a lot like that.
Will it hold out to be that?
That will be a mystery I want to see solved.
And we're left with this conundrum of, you know,
is what we are looking at...
You almost don't want to say it out loud.
It's a mystery with profound implications,
but one that will require further analysis
before anyone is willing to back it wholeheartedly.
The excavation is now approaching
its third and final week.
Perhaps the most important bone
has been left until the skull.
Its shape and the size of its brow ridges will be crucial
in telling them whether the creature of Rising Star
human.
We're going to go ahead and bite the bullet
and take that skull out, okay?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, good, good.
If only because it gets it out of the way.
Yes, I know.
Not because you want it out to see it, right?
Oh, I want it out!
A couple of reasons we want to get it out.
One, the skull can tell you a lot.
It can tell you cranial capacity,
start getting an idea of the shape of the skull.
Is it Australopith-like and pinched in the front,
or is it rounded more like a human,
or is it something in between,
does it have a sagittal crest neck?
We want to see that skull.
And also the skull was probably
the most complex initial extraction.
It is fragile, it's a thin piece of bone,
and it could break apart.
We need to know whether we could get something like that out.
And we need to get it out to see what was underneath it,
whether this was a skeleton
or whether there were lots of individuals
associated with each other.
So there was all this tension,
and it was a lot harder to extract than we thought.
Oh, I'm sure you'll find plenty.
All right, stage on in after her.
Good luck, everyone.
Have a blast, huh?
Thank you. Will do. All right.
Let's get you something here.
Go get 'em!
Good luck.
Happy hunting. Thank you.
Enjoy topside.
The skull is extremely fragile.
The team carefully scans the area immediately around it.
How big? Yeah, those are perfect.
Then they begin the laborious process of removing
every tiny fragment of bone surrounding the skull.
Oh, we've got medium bags now.
Finally, they delicately scrape away the dirt to release it.
We're done this easily.
Got it.
Everyone was feeling all these points of tension
around the science of the skull,
when we knew it was imminent coming out.
We only had two people down on the bottom,
and they were working on it, Becca and Marina,
and working and working and working, and finally
we kept trying to call them out and they wouldn't come out,
because they knew they were that close to the extraction,
and eventually it did come out.
That's it.
It's so fragile.
With everyone holding their breath,
praying that it doesn't break, the skull fragment is finally
lifted and delicately placed in a box.
That's it.
Then it begins its slow ascent, leaving the cave
for the first time in possibly millions of years.
He's holding the box.
Yeah, that's right, he's holding the box,
so he can't do this, he's gotta be much more careful than that.
Yeah, all right, there it is, all right.
How fantastic.
Wow.
And all of those scientists piled back in, all of the people
that spent so much time and so much energy
coming to this moment, went back in there,
and they lined up in the most difficult places
up the Dragon Back to Base 1 and they knew there was a risk
that it could get damaged, if dropped it could get destroyed.
And this huge team effort occurred as they handed this off
from one to the other, as it moved its way
from this dark recess where it's been for however long it's been
to the entrance of the cave where those of us
not privileged enough to be able to get into this system
had to wait with huge tension, watching this passage
on the cameras until there it was.
There you go folks, let's go get it.
Great moment.
It's like a Rocky moment.
There is so much wonder, no one's bored,
no one's too academic to hold it in.
Everyone is just brimming with childlike excitement.
Would you hate me if I took this before I hug you?
Please take it.
Oh, well done.
I don't even want to hug you with that thing in your hand.
I'm going to give this off to John.
I'm constantly sitting there and stopping myself and going,
"Oh my God, this is like... It's old.
"It's probably the first time this fossil has seen
the light of the day in millions of years,"
and so I'm continually sort of having to stop and just think
for a moment and sort of revel in it.
It's the moment everyone has been waiting for.
They hope the skull fragment will be the telltale piece
to identify the creature of Rising Star
as either an Australopith or a member of our own genus.
Looking at a left frontal, so it's this part, the orbit,
and then part of the brain case behind the orbit.
And that is a very important piece.
Large orbital ridges with indentations behind them
would indicate Australopith.
Smaller brow ridges
with evidence of a more rounded skull would say Homo.
We do have our genus.
We do?
We have our genus with that.
Yes, yes!
They have a new member of our genus.
Did we do good?
We did good.
What can it tell them
about the mysterious dawn of humanity?
We are certain that this is in the genus Homo, our genus,
and we are certain it's a new species.
And that's where we are right now.
The idea that we've discovered a large number of individuals,
males and females, young and old, of a new species
in the genus Homo.
In the next phase, they'll have to piece together
and analyze the rest of the fossil remains.
Already they have almost 2,000 bone fragments
from more than 12 individuals.
The Rising Star discovery is one of the most startling
and amazing discoveries in all of hominin evolution.
To have that many fossils in one place is unprecedented
and took everybody by surprise.
The excavation was planned as a three-week operation.
As it nears its end, the scientists know
they will have barely scratched the surface of what Rising Star
has to offer.
I had never seen or dreamed of anything
like the richness of this site.
There aren't just hundreds of bones,
there are thousands of bones, it's clear.
You can't blow on the ground
and it doesn't uncover another one.
They can't gently brush their hand across it, and teeth,
and long bones don't fall out, usually of another individual.
This is going to take a long, long, long time.
As everybody goes home, the Rising Star fossils are
carefully transported to the University of the Witwatersrand.
It was here, 90 years ago,
that Raymond Dart sparked a firestorm
by declaring that the dawn of humanity was in Africa.
It seems fitting that it is here too that the mysterious
early humans of Rising Star will begin to tell their story.
At a symposium six months after the excavation,
researchers meet for an intensive analysis
of the fossil material.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
They're in the analytical phase here,
they're in the diagnostic phase, and it's been an experiment
in, you know, working together, bringing together some of
the brightest minds on the planet with some of
the most current data sets
to analyze over 1,700 fossil hominin remains
that we recovered only last November.
And it's been fantastic to watch.
I mean it's this constant energy of science.
And you can almost feel it in the room right now.
We are total nerds, it's nerd heaven here,
but I mean it is an extraordinary experience.
There's never been anything like this before in the field
of hominin paleontology, to get a group of young,
talented scholars together to bring their new techniques
and their fresh outlooks on the record
to newly discovered fossil hominin remains.
This certainly never happened when I was a Ph.D. student
and I would have died to have done this.
As the analysis goes on, the bones from the Rising Star cave
are finally ready to be presented to the world.
We've got a new species of early human in the genus Homo,
and that's tremendously exciting.
We've never had anything in that transition period
between the late Australopiths and the earliest members
of our genus in any kind of abundance,
and boy, we have it in abundance now.
To members of the team, the fossils suggest a creature
unlike anything ever found before.
We're looking at creatures that are humanlike in their feet,
humanlike in their hands, humanlike in their teeth,
everything that interacts directly with the environment
is Homo.
And everything that is sort of central... you know, the trunk,
the architecture of the vertebral column, the brain...
Those sorts of things are more primitive.
It's like evolution is crafting us from the outside in.
We've called the species Homo naledi and "naledi"
means "star" in Sotho and we've called the chamber
that the fossils come from, it still has fantastic fossils
to be found, the Dinaledi chamber,
which means the chamber of stars.
Homo naledi is a strange mosaic of ape and human,
small brained and small bodied with chimp-like arms,
but with human hands, teeth, small brows and long legs,
probably a long-distance walker.
Naledi is
a surprise in very many ways.
It's got an incredibly tiny brain,
a brain that's more than a third as small
as a modern human's brain is.
Yet it's clear when you look at the cranial shape,
the dentition, the legs, particularly the feet
and even the hands, that this thing is part of our genus.
Here are creatures on the cusp of becoming human,
but still very close to the Australopith world.
It makes the question of how they got into the cave
even more intriguing.
It looks like they got in there because somebody put them there.
Now, if we say that, you have to understand
that's a very controversial thing to say.
And in so we approach it very conservatively.
We can show that there's no signs of predation.
We can show that there's no predator that accumulates
only hominins in this way.
We can show that they didn't all get there at once.
We can show there's not a flow of material into the chamber,
and that's where we leave it scientifically.
You know, we can say, the best hypothesis we can come up is
they were put there.
If this is true, its implications are far-reaching.
They now know that the Rising Star hominin had
a brain size in the range
between 450 and 550 cubic centimeters.
That's just slightly larger than a chimp's.
So if in fact the Rising Star hominins are purposefully
disposing of their dead, we're talking about
some small-brained hominins who are doing this.
And that begins to change our thinking about sort of
the cognitive attributes and the neural machinery that you need
to engage in that kind of behavior.
And that becomes really interesting.
The accumulation of Homo naledi skeletons in the cave raises
the type of big question that Raymond Dart wanted to answer.
What type of creatures were our primitive ancestors?
If the naledi skeletons have indeed
been intentionally disposed of, some sort of burial,
it would indicate already quite advanced social behavior.
This fits with new ways of thinking about the transition
from ape to human.
Many scientists now believe that a key element of that transition
was the growth of ever-stronger cooperation and social bonds.
Psychologist Michael Tomasello has spent a lifetime
comparing the social behavior and capacities of chimpanzees
and human children.
Well, there's social and there's ultra-social.
And all mammals are social to some degree.
Great apes are especially social in the sense that they form
long-term relationships with others
and have bonding relationships with others, and they groom,
they support each other in fights.
So they're very highly social creatures, but a lot of it
is organized around competition, so a lot of it is organized
around coalitions to fight over food and so forth.
And in humans we of course haven't lost our selfish
and competitive streak,
but we have become so much more cooperative.
Not perfectly cooperative, but much more cooperative.
The fact that we can
sit in an airplane
with 300 or 400 individuals of breeding age
that we aren't related to and not rip each other apart
is a uniquely human character and it was evolved
on this landscape behind me.
Because Africa is a harsh place and we as early humans had
to evolve cooperation in order to survive here.
We didn't have big canines, and sharp claws.
We just had each other.
Humans are the most highly social primates
ever to walk the earth.
We bond and form relationships far more complex
than any other primate.
So if the Rising Star chamber is indeed a burial,
perhaps this would suggest that here at the dawn of humanity
those more complex social bonds had begun to take shape.
This possibility will generate fierce debate
as other scientists weigh in.
But how do these discoveries change the narrative
of human evolution?
There is an old refrain in paleoanthropology.
People always say we need more fossils, we need more fossils,
we need more fossils, but the fact of the matter is
more fossils just complicate the picture.
One compelling question to be answered is
where do these new fossil ancestors fall
on our family tree?
Dating the fossils is proving to be difficult and complex.
It will take time.
The thing that's hard about it is we don't know how old
those fossils are, and we can tell what they look like
because we have so many of them, but if they're 3,000 years old
or if they are three million years old it's going to mean
a very different thing for how it changes our understanding
of human evolution.
Because we have a date, things are a little clearer
with the Malapa finds.
At 1.97 million years old, most scientists believe sediba
is too late to be a direct ancestor of ours.
Our genus Homo was already established by the time
sediba came along.
But even if sediba is not our direct ancestor,
it does show there were many different types
of primitive ancestors living together at the same time.
Okay, yeah, yeah, keep pulling.
Great, great!
The quality of the material that Lee is uncovering
is really phenomenal.
Sediba shows that we had more than two or three species
in South Africa 1.9 million years ago.
It's a very interesting find.
It shows that there were diversity.
It's a beautiful material, but I don't think that sediba
was ancestral to our genus Homo.
Whether or not they are our direct ancestors,
the fossils at Malapa and Rising Star point us toward
a new way of thinking about human evolution.
We have the strong tendency to want to draw simple lines
between species, and make nice family trees,
and we have to understand that that's our need.
That's our desire.
That's not necessarily the way that nature works
It's very natural to think about human evolution as a sort of
family tree in deep time.
But evolution is much more complex than that.
Evolution is bushy, there are different experiments,
populations try different adaptations,
they try different ways of being about the world.
Paleoanthropologists talk about the bushiness of human evolution
as a metaphor for the many types of early hominins
and the difficulty of knowing which one led to us,
but even that metaphor may not do justice
to the way evolution works.
Nature is messy.
Nature is complicated.
Nature does not really respect our desire to put fossils
into neat bins and to sort of name nice neat species.
Both sediba and naledi have a mosaic of Australopith
and Homo features.
They seem to show that at the dawn of humanity
there were multiple evolutionary experiments with small-bodied,
small-brained, upright-walking apes.
Scientists now know some of these varieties
of late Australopith and early Homo lived together
at the same time.
And some of them may have been interbreeding.
These aren't fully formed species and there's a lot
of interbreeding between these groups.
Some adaptive features are evolving in one group,
other adaptive features are evolving in other groups,
and by interbreeding those are coming together.
And if that's the case we may never be able to draw neat lines
between any of these groups and later Homo.
Perhaps now we need a new metaphor to help us
understand our evolution, one that expresses better
the dynamic and fluid nature of it.
Now perhaps the best metaphor is a braided stream.
And that's brought on by discovery of these
mosaic hominins like naledi, sediba, and others.
They're showing us there's lots of experiments going on.
Some of these evolutionary experiments died out,
others came together and interbred.
The ebb and flow of genes through these groups
was probably so complex that we may have to give up hope
of discovering a simple linear evolution.
So imagine in your mind a glacier in the top of a valley
and what happens is as it melts, it creates many, many rivulets
and some of them are large and some are small,
and they all move off down the valley.
And almost inevitably at the end of that valley is going to be
a lake, of which some, maybe the majority,
but not all are contributing to.
I think we have to begin looking at these species we're finding
as almost individual channels in a braided stream.
It's clear they have something to do with the end-population
and that's us, the billions of human beings alive today.
But it's hard to tell which one's the most responsible
for us being here.
The new finds on the plains of South Africa are adding
a vital new chapter to the story of our origins.
The tantalizing gap in the fossil record
at the beginning of our genus is being slowly filled in.
Finally, there is light at the "Dawn of Humanity."
The investigation continues online This program is available on DVD.
To order, visit shopPBS.org or call 1-800-PLAY-PBS.
Is also available for download on iTunes.